From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 26 23:19:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727B816A41A for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:19:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D12E13C4A7 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:19:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay7.apple.com (relay7.apple.com [17.128.113.37]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7E9CDF643; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay7.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay7.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 2A012300A6; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:19:04 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807125-a2a1fbb0000007e5-44-46a92be8c32e Received: from [17.214.13.96] (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 14DD53005F; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:19:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <963552.78675.qm@web53508.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <963552.78675.qm@web53508.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <29A01555-72D6-4184-8F06-B9FD3C3C6345@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:19:03 -0700 To: Kurt Abahar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Keeping Ports and Packages Synchronized X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:19:04 -0000 On Jul 26, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Kurt Abahar wrote: > I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree > synchronized with that from which the latest packages > in packages-6-stable were built. > > Is there a way to accomplish this? Sure, you probably want something like "portupgrade -P" or "portupgrade -PP" options. Note that if you have reason to select non-default options, you're better off building the ports locally to suit your preferences... -- -Chuck