From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 4 09:39:52 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA19058 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 09:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA19052 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 09:39:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com ([13.231.132.20]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <16433(4)>; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 09:39:02 PST Received: from gnu.mc.xerox.com (gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com) by gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13031; Thu, 4 Jan 96 12:39:07 EST Received: by gnu.mc.xerox.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13813; Thu, 4 Jan 96 12:39:05 EST Message-Id: <9601041739.AA13813@gnu.mc.xerox.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: Terry Lambert Cc: d_burr@ix.netcom.com (Donald Burr), web@merit.edu, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which vi is used in FreeBSD 2.1 ?? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 03 Jan 1996 09:48:43 PST." <199601031748.KAA14974@phaeton.artisoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 09:39:04 PST From: "Marty Leisner" Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk My understanding is the Bill Joy vi doesn't even catch SIGWINCH... Would you prefer a vi (like Sun's) which doesn't resize in an xterm? -- marty leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com Member of the League for Programming Freedom