Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:08:10 +0200
From:      Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>
To:        "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Cc:        Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.
Message-ID:  <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
References:  <4E454ADD.1020201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812171611.GA88850@slackbox.erewhon.net> <CABzXLYP6bTskimizXcNLuq+DKZBszTWy2d7nbqff4PR8iNGYkg@mail.gmail.com> <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431d=
b398.gz
> > Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
> > permissions et cetera OK?
> >
> > Roland
>=20
> No, it does not.
>=20
> What I did so far over night:
>=20
> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.=20
> Again failure.
> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).=20
> Everything seems
> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a=20
> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very=20
> same failure:
>=20
> (portsnap fetch extract:)
> /usr/ports/devel/cccc/
> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz=
 not=20
> found -- snapshot corrupt.

I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is genera=
ted
by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking fo=
r a
file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO

1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
3) tar (ditto)

When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with
tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.t=
gz'
in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar.  If so, that would be a bug!

Roland
--=20
R.F.Smith                                   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5GTQoACgkQEnfvsMMhpyVx+ACdEth6ybOUsgxh1cOlSJB01We3
pscAn00aP4nagOuYxswIKvb48Moq5PcT
=hJmN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110813100810.GA27193>