Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 23:30:46 -0500 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: Ryan Stone <rstone@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r279471 - stable/10/sys/dev/pci Message-ID: <CAFMmRNz6c2gc%2B-iC4GVSX0kag2JZVG2RfTO5JEZWyABgqHwC7Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201503010426.t214Qm0d000607@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201503010426.t214Qm0d000607@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Ryan Stone <rstone@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: rstone > Date: Sun Mar 1 04:26:47 2015 > New Revision: 279471 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279471 > > Log: > MFC r264091 > > Correct a PCI enumeration bug introduced in r264011 > > Ensure that first_func is set to 0 on every iteration of the PCI slot > enumeration loop after the first. There is a continue statement that would > cause first_func to stay at 1 any PCI device where slot 0 has no functions > until we find a slot that does have a function. This would cause us to > not enumerate the first PCI function on the device. > > Credit to markj@ for spotting the bug. > > X-MFC-With: r264011 So I didn't get an MFC notice for this one (and I very nearly forgot to MFC it, which would have been fairly disastrous for somebody :( ). Is my understanding of the X-MFC-With: tag incorrect? I thought that setting it would cause me to get a reminder at the same time as r264011
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFMmRNz6c2gc%2B-iC4GVSX0kag2JZVG2RfTO5JEZWyABgqHwC7Q>