Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:42:57 -0400
From:      Michael Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org>
To:        Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: False vuxml alarms (ImageMagick)
Message-ID:  <20040812154257.GA1084@wombat.jungle>
In-Reply-To: <20040812111923.GA95203@nagual.pp.ru>
References:  <20040812102051.GA92918@nagual.pp.ru> <544C53D4-EC4E-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <20040812111923.GA95203@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> [040812 07:21]:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:56:57PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>=20
> > >>>>>>libpng stack-based buffer overflow and other code concerns.
> >=20
> > Perhaps we should change the title to `errors in handling of specially=
=20
> > crafted png files' or make an extra entry for ImageMagick. But since al=
l=20
> > problems seem to be exploited by the same set of png files, the former=
=20
> > seems to be the proper solution.
>=20
> But this one should be removed. The root of whole problem is: ImageMagick=
=20
> not understand patched libpng well. The entry should be rewritted to=20
> something like that, instead of confusing one. Please don't ask me to go=
=20
> and commit, not with my bad English.

I beleive the phrasing you are looking for is something like:

"Missing support for latest libpng security updates."

or something like that, which indicates that ImageMagik itself doesn't
have a security flaw but it also doesn't work with the patched libpng.
Also, would the same situation apply to other ports (mozilla and
firefox, for example) which just use libpng?  I haven't looked too
deeply into the problem, i just upgrade libpng and everything else :)

--K

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBG5ABfY3jRMAKmKERAh+VAJ4n23Zz9x0DZCPrGCHF7n3RsvfYTwCgk/In
UDDGG11m2bgxldSSlU18Vr8=
=JM/1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040812154257.GA1084>