From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 14 13:50:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1260316A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 May 2004 13:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de
	[129.217.129.133])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9886443D48
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 May 2004 13:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105])
	by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E6525167591; Fri, 14 May 2004 22:50:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.8.4] (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4EKoYZA014596
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Fri, 14 May 2004 22:50:34 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm@inbox.lv>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 22:50:30 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <200405141700.i4EH0gSp024041@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<40A50E0A.6060405@fillmore-labs.com> <200405141327.27440.ringworm@inbox.lv>
In-Reply-To: <200405141327.27440.ringworm@inbox.lv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_ZETpAB5oLXm/IcV";
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200405142250.33920.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
cc: FreeBSD ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: x11-wm/xwmm [WAS: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 20:50:53 -0000


--Boundary-02=_ZETpAB5oLXm/IcV
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 14 May 2004 22:27, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> The only thing I really intended to do was clear up one little problem
> reported at
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ports@freebsd.org.html
>
> So I am going ahead and submitting a PR to eliminate x11-wm/xwmm
> unless anyone has an objection.

Why?! You totally misunderstand what's going on - xwmm is not broken. It's=
=20
failing on the _alpha_ platform, and that's caused by a bug in gcc, not xwm=
m.=20
So why do you want to remove it?

It's nice you want to help getting the community maintained ports back into=
=20
shape, but xwmm does not need maintainance. The best thing for you to do=20
would be to go on and try to fix a different port from the list.

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--Boundary-02=_ZETpAB5oLXm/IcV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBApTEZXhc68WspdLARAlnzAJwLJ03CfzkVd2RFeOJNX6PxGmw+wgCeOQ85
Ld4Buy52/Oc24AxnzrTR2TA=
=NMaU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_ZETpAB5oLXm/IcV--