From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 13:56:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2834106564A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921B78FC0A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A15446B06; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:56:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D06BEB95E; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:56:39 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:50:54 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201112112102.pBBL21kB068967@svn.freebsd.org> <4F1DE4FF.3080606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201250850.54443.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:56:39 -0500 (EST) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Florian Smeets , src-committers@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: svn commit: r228424 - in head/sys: kern sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:56:40 -0000 On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:08:39 am Ivan Voras wrote: > On 23 January 2012 23:53, Florian Smeets wrote: > > > which creates a database work set of ~1.5GB. Max throughput was achieved > > at 20 Clients. > > > At 40 threads the results varied between 43000 - 76500 across reboots. > > Attilio suspects that this can be caused by the kernel memory layout > > changing under the woods creating cache effects difficult to control, > > therefor the scaling factor was reduced to 10 (~150MB work set) and the > > numbers got deterministic across reboot. > > Or possibly NUMA? Though 40 processes and 1.5 GB seem too low for NUMA > effects to be so noticable... It can be noticable for at least some workloads. It may reduce some of the noise in this case. > Was the round-robin allocator talked about in here: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-October/036525.html > ever actually committed? I seem to remember some other thread which > said it wasn't yet but can't find it now, and I also cannot find the > commit. It is not. > AFAIK the current state of NUMA is still described in > http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/210550 Yes. -- John Baldwin