Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:38:52 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: linux-base 6.2 vs  linux-base 7
Message-ID:  <20011123133852.B4488@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111231942230.876-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>; from dinesh@alphaque.com on Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:44:28PM %2B0800
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111231942230.876-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:44:28PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
>=20
> hey,
>=20
> have linux-base 6.2 installed and working fine for a bunch of linux
> binaries including staroffice 5.2 and netscape-linux, both from the ports
> collection. planning on trying out staroffice 6.0-beta, but it depends on
> linux_base-7.
>=20
> my question is if i used portsupgrade to replace linux base 6.2 with 7,
> will anything else break ? would love to hear user experiences on this
> one.

linux_base-7 needs an updated linuxulator..you need to cvsup your
source tree to RELENG_4 and rebuild your world and kernel.

Kris

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7/sHrWry0BWjoQKURAh0UAKC/qGmMgNv6ypeleyeqgwrhOdnXawCeM2O7
O+UUcH/zuGerTOJUjqFFhPE=
=GDYe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011123133852.B4488>