Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Jun 1996 20:13:03 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-current users)
Subject:   Re: socketpair bug?
Message-ID:  <199606271813.UAA02652@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <31D18BE9.4BF61CB5@fa.tdktca.com> from Alex Nash at "Jun 26, 96 02:13:45 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Alex Nash wrote:

> > Oh, I have found where the problem is. socketpair() actually succeeded but
> > returned the value of first descriptor in pair instead of 0. This is
> > strange because it does not conform to man page (I am not sure wheither it
> > comforms to POSIX too).

> We also have a PR that covers this, 731.

See also my Usenet reply: socketpair() basically needs a similar libc
syscall wrapper like pipe().  Right now, it uses the generic syscall
wrapper which is wrong.  (The XXX??'s can be removed again then. :)

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606271813.UAA02652>