From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 19:55:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEF016A41C; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:55:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@wm-access.no) Received: from lakepoint.domeneshop.no (lakepoint.domeneshop.no [194.63.248.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E021243D1F; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:55:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@wm-access.no) Received: from [192.168.4.8] (host-81-191-4-179.bluecom.no [81.191.4.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by lakepoint.domeneshop.no (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5JJsxTP027768; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:55:00 +0200 Message-ID: <42B5CD89.6070509@wm-access.no> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:54:49 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <51688.147.175.8.5.1119105461.squirrel@webmail.satronet.sk> <42B46C9B.7000206@mac.com> <200506190004.48066.vanco@satro.sk> <200506182214.33279.josemi@redesjm.local> <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050619082944.GA11972@cell.sick.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: id=AE7F1636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Michal Vanco Subject: Re: Routes not deleted after link down X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:55:02 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is. > > What is opinion of other networkers? > How about also adding a sysctl for setting a delay time between event and disabling of the route? Then even people with roaming wlan cards can benefit. Also it is in my opinion that the route be disabled (moved to a passive route table maybe?) and not deleted. At my old job i came across situations where the lack of this feature caused headaches and once or twice the loss of a customer. -- Sten Daniel Sørsdal