Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:13:20 +0800 From: Rong-En Fan <rafan@infor.org> To: Marcus Grando <marcus@corp.grupos.com.br> Cc: sem@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/policyd name conflict Message-ID: <20050414031320.GA82105@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <425DDC09.7070802@corp.grupos.com.br> References: <200503210441.j2L4fQRB021246@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> <20050322090810.GY34807@k7.mavetju> <42401591.9090306@corp.grupos.com.br> <20050322133325.GA1849@heechee.tobez.org> <20050412213158.GA41666@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <425DDC09.7070802@corp.grupos.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:57:13PM -0300, Marcus Grando wrote: > Hi, > > > mail/postfix-policyd-sqlgrey > > mail/postfix-policyd-postgrey > > mail/postfix-policyd-spf > mail/postfix-policyd-greylist > > For me is the best way. to me, the part after policyd should be the name of original software name? > > A bit long name? If in this case, I would suggest that we don't > > touch them and just rename mail/policyd to mail/policyd-spf > > and the new one will be mail/policyd (just google policyd, it is > > in the second result). > > I don't think so. Long name is not problem. Hmm, I think again and again. agree with you. > > This week i send PR to rename mail/policyd to mail/postfix-policyd-spf Thanks, then I'll send a new policyd shar. Regards, rafan.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050414031320.GA82105>