Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 21:32:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255750] databases/pgloader3: minor updates in lisp deps Message-ID: <bug-255750-7788-MZP2RVLtzs@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-255750-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-255750-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255750 --- Comment #3 from Mario Duhanic <freebsd-ravioli@duhanic.com> --- (In reply to Rainer Hurling from comment #2) Hi Rainer, thanks for your quick reply! Yes, the VC head doesn't make much sense anymore with git, thanks for point= ing that out! I will put a bit more time into taking care of the provided patch so no bac= kup files will be included (usually I have Makefile with a "phony clean" target= ). Speaking of time: I have built some maintenance tools to maintain quicklisp ports like this one. I've started from scratch again as someone asked me to write about "why I love POSIX/SUS" and I wrote it in that manner only. But = it's not fully automated and so I decided to have some quarterly refresh of that port. I've gone through all diffs and looked into the release notes if available = and I decided that it would be a good idea to increase the PORTREVISION. It mig= ht be interesting to have a flag that marks this port as "update ports Makefile but leave binary"; okay, I could just have let PORTREVISION untouched (i.e.= 0) but the changes were a bit more than just cosmetic and I couldn't tell if t= hey would deeply affect parts I wouldn't think of (this port needs almost 70 distfiles) ). So what do you think: * should we proceed and increase the PORTREVISION as proposed * or should we proceed and remove the PORTREVISION from the new Makefile to offer a new port but not to build it automatically * or leave v3.6.2 as is to wait for some major updates? I will include the patch just after this reply for the case they'll be need= ed without the backup file, sorry for that and thank you very much again for y= our comments! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-255750-7788-MZP2RVLtzs>