From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 29 15:18:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670C2B31 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A3A8FC12 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id go10so11783194lbb.13 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:18:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i91VE+9yp66Zxw+LZA9EXNn14omfRLcELpdYSeecPOw=; b=TaW5r3Lw/Ii7FJqST/mPExtlHktEhEwlBIPdJLCzdtC6O13HzOtBsxqpy6URXTKQkU xtuBphGREKph59bUiQjKKgLYr5izMJduLiXwMo9NdBqsCmIFPgAAVbg8TDV8NBJ9OVan 2/yygtR0s8XYDDdvCng7Ns41Vl4ogFz/6eETg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=i91VE+9yp66Zxw+LZA9EXNn14omfRLcELpdYSeecPOw=; b=FitEQhNJ60HZxsWt02tbxtvfg+hmrIbdMUv7LzFhfdCvgubpG54Fp/GzXW8HQGWNIF RrFEBN5g22JJGTIxxel3a/ONZh3SHEzxYM2ae4mEgZ7QJaVHQjAfdh7KYx0UrhUqdZvO 4/znEOnRNdefJ3VzqdbNhx6FNGYd8c675i8oEGUMo5scaPggbhttYLuX4g1Jee+NjCQN LORZHZtSjKN09cdwMjER1BSTMKgXuk8hxTfnvuAve6otXwRDv6FCWkzOGHya9FSdLLVp 7ECLYt5YJBZqfGtidR9K0wMW3IFKkEBgiJhyEXjZ83sExqB94lGRnQwXEcQmHx9K2+yB bwmg== Received: by 10.112.25.34 with SMTP id z2mr9709436lbf.125.1354202305474; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:18:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.154.168 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:17:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50B77C3B.6070305@digiware.nl> References: <50ACA518.4050309@digiware.nl> <50ACEEFF.8010001@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0A20.2070408@digiware.nl> <50AD0AC2.5070804@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0B29.6060602@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0F00.5020600@digiware.nl> <50AD13EE.8050901@digiware.nl> <50AD17E4.50104@FreeBSD.org> <50AD189D.4040902@digiware.nl> <50AD1941.2020108@FreeBSD.org> <50ADF362.2040803@FreeBSD.org> <20121123140932.3a6deff6@mr129166> <50AF88AA.1060003@FreeBSD.org> <50AFF419.3070604@digiware.nl> <50AFF7C1.2090405@FreeBSD.org> <50AFFB9C.8050101@digiware.nl> <20121126111052.68136d00@mr129166> <50B3421B.2010606@FreeBSD.org> <20121129094137.6829eae8@mr129166> <50B7229D.4090901@digiware.nl> <50B77A6A.9050604@FreeBSD.org> <50B77C3B.6070305@digiware.nl> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:17:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some new hardware with 9.1 does not reboot easily To: Willem Jan Withagen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWGdBdgJN1VgoaURFnDa00txGguNybPqq6OWyPgffXUcf2X7177fND2febeSxdvtySMT4F Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , Patrick Lamaiziere , Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:18:27 -0000 On 29 November 2012 10:16, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > On 2012-11-29 16:08, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 29/11/2012 10:53 Willem Jan Withagen said the following: >>> On 2012-11-29 9:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: >>>> Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200, >>>> Andriy Gapon a =C3=A9crit : >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>>> on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following: >>>>>> As far I can see it fails because there is no getnewvnode_reserve() >>>>>> / get_newvnode_drop_reserve() in 9.1. >>>>> >>>>> The patch is for stable/9. >>>> >>>> Ok, thanks. >>>> >>>> I've made a new diff because Willem's patch does not apply >>>> on 9.STABLE (fails on opensolaris_lookup.c) : >>>> >>>> This one is for 9-stable rev 243569: >>>> http://user.lamaiziere.net/patrick/9-STABLE-r243569-patch-zfs-reboot >>>> >>>> It solves the reboot problem on my server. I'm testing it on my >>>> workstation with few "poudriere bulk". It looks to work. >> >> Thank you very much for testing! >> >>> Andriy sent me his diff aginst HEAD, which I reworked against the code = I >>> have here locally. I did an svn diff against the checkout of that >>> morning. And I'm pretty sure i'm tracking stable/9 >>> >>> So I'm not sure where I went wrong, but thanx for fixing it. >> >> I MFC-ed some ZFS changed from HEAD last weekend. > > Would that mean that the regular checkout of stable/9 contains enough > code to allow "painless" rebooting... > > Reason I ask: > I'm about to ship the server to the customer > > But there is still 45 minutes before UPS comes to pick it up. > And I'd rather run a regular checkout, instead of the patched one. > > Which then gets me to the svn question: > How do I easily get ride of the changeds? If I understand what you want correctly, just run 'svn revert -R .' --=20 Eitan Adler