From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 18 01:09:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1416710657A8 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9F48FC0A for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21582 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:32:58 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200911180032.RAA21582@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:32:53 -0700 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: State of interface polling in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:09:57 -0000 I'm building a FreeBSD router based on a small, Intel Atom-based board and am trying to decide whether or not to configure the kernel for polling. What's the current state of interface polling in FreeBSD? Is it worth doing with a single CPU, or will it actually increase system overhead? What "HZ" settings are recommended? --Brett Glass