From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 31 14:04:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6FF1065676; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A59C8FC12; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-065-190-149-241.nc.res.rr.com [65.190.149.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6VE4loi061516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:04:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E3560FF.1060305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:04:47 -0400 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110531 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Steinmetz References: <20110731023007.GA57933@fast.rit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20110731023007.GA57933@fast.rit.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:04:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: linimon@FreeBSD.org, wxs@FreeBSD.org, stas@FreeBSD.org, ruby@FreeBSD.org, tabthorpe@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: Replacing graphics/ruby-rmagick with graphics/rubygem-rmagick X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:04:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ryan, On 07/30/11 22:30, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: > All, > > I am planning on removing graphics/ruby-rmagick and replacing it with > graphics/rubygem-rmagick, pending maintainer/mentor approval. > > They both install the same library (RMagick2.so), however, the rubygem > registers with the gem framework. Without it being registered as a gem, > other ruby applications which depend on the gem consider it not to be > installed and complain. > > As a result, I believe that the best course of action is to update the > dependencies in the two ports that depend on ruby-rmagick > (graphics/rubygem-gruff and www/redmine) and remove > graphics/ruby-rmagick, replacing it with graphics/rubygem-rmagick. > > I'd welcome any thoughts/feedback you may have. > > I do not have any attachments to being the MAINTAINER for > rubygem-rmagick, so if stas@ (or anyone else) is interested in it, > please let me know. Sounds like a good plan to me. I think leaving the maintainer as ruby@ is fine, that way we can update it without waiting on maintainer approval. Thanks for the work on ruby ports! Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJONWD/AAoJEPXPYrMgexuh5vYH/0i2VsMwJjvFPybCipuzHA2e 8UF3PLgZxbI7l542GKUSLineL+X0KUY0oZ0tUiycVii2gjWoJZMmOflCB3wxWq8+ 72bYb+fAyeiaoe4BKNX7sbgiH1IX9QLFyMIloF0kpwboAMuK+MbKet7RWFBAuwB6 CAHurp0oBxs68msIwiG/Vdy7QaPvq07+Ju+sUwnsDRr53KSD0K5nmzG8eQZZ78Ju PyS1YuG1kgkZd34soQEB4t+cNxRZ6c3MJS4JKfV1ifKfRpnnofoWzHWWHCyV4wMG X+mshvoQd2iPmH0Pqb5vMToDCrqF543NHe/NTr8w1noQQNTcf9oOHP16QNTVlTU= =0U5w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----