From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  1 23:32:54 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AF337B401
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Apr 2003 23:32:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [207.200.153.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA25D43F3F
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Apr 2003 23:32:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tom@sdf.com)
Received: from tom (helo=localhost)
	by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 190bEI-0007kd-00; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:56:10 -0800
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:56:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To: Mantzios Achilleus <mantzios@softlab.ece.ntua.gr>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304011822280.22348-100000@theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10304012153040.3487-100000@misery.sdf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Imkenberg@t-online.de
cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD the right platfrom for JBOSS ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:32:54 -0000


On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Mantzios Achilleus wrote:

> I think the big battle will be between linux 2.6.x with NPTL,
> and FreeBSD 5.x with KSE. (Also Jeff Roberson's team has
> contributed a new 1:1 Threading implementation on FreeBSD)
...

  Why would you want a 1:1 threading implementation?

Tom