Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 May 2013 19:57:18 +0200
From:      "Michael Ross" <gmx@ross.cx>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: List Spam Filtering
Message-ID:  <op.wwxlhsqgg7njmm@michael-think>
In-Reply-To: <201305090026.r490QQeA095142@fire.js.berklix.net>
References:  <201305090026.r490QQeA095142@fire.js.berklix.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com>  
wrote:

> Hi questions@ ( spammer not cc'd )
>
> Reference:
>> From:		Aaron Seligman <aseligman@altitudedigitalpartners.com>
>> Reply-to:	aseligman@altitudedigitalpartners.com
>> Date:		Wed, 08 May 2013 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC)
>> Subject:	Re: Display & Video Campaigns-Inventory Needed
>> Message-id:	<1368039547.0568389241738319@mf7.sendgrid.net>
>
>> Happy hump-day,
>>
>> We have an opportunity with an RTB partner to monetize
>>
>> INT Geo's; UK, CAN, AUS
>>
>> Video: (Pre-roll, mid-roll and post-roll)
>
>
> If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
>   - List could silently discard such spam.
>   - Postmaster@  (& webmaster@ weeding web archives) would have less  
> work.
>   - Less individual need to select spam phrases to copy to personal  
> filters
>     (& less time searching WTF dialect American above meant in English  
> ;-).
>
> Newbies would be told "subscribe before posting" in all of:
> 	/etc/motd
> 	http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> 	Automatic list bounce response.
> Only clueless, lazy, & spammers might be lost. A net gain.
>
> Cheers,
> Julian


I'm curious how much spam you get through this list.

Just counted, and I have about 2 Spams per week for the last month,
that's more than usual.


Regards,

Michael



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wwxlhsqgg7njmm>