Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:45:15 -0400 From: Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net> To: Francisco Reyes <fran@reyes.somos.net> Cc: Charles Anderson <caa@columbus.rr.com>, Marc van Woerkom <van.woerkom@netcologne.de>, "FreeBSD-arch@FreeBSD.ORG" <FreeBSD-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>, "FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG" <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG>, "grog@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com" <grog@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> Subject: Re: -e option to umount? Message-ID: <394DA55B.7D884B0C@cvzoom.net> References: <200006190354.XAA22495@sanson.reyes.somos.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Francisco Reyes wrote: > Whether as a separate command or as part of umount this is > certainly something worth having by default. > In particular new users may be a while before they find > ports/packages or will just end up in the questions list. Well, you could have both. For example, you could have the -e switch to umount which performs the eject function. In addition, you could have "eject" as a link to umount, and umount itself would check argv[0] to see if it is being executed as eject or umount. If it's eject instead of umount, then perform whatever action the -e flag does. - Donn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?394DA55B.7D884B0C>