From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 29 21: 7:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593B737B400 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463D343E3B for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:07:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7U4692F041522; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:06:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:06:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20020829.220607.73652258.imp@bsdimp.com> To: jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org Cc: culverk@yumyumyum.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting libc_r from -current to -stable From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20020829152549.GB393@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20020829151048.GL89683@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20020829112210.L22530-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org> <20020829152549.GB393@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: <20020829152549.GB393@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Jonathon McKitrick writes: : On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:22:38AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: : | Oh, I didn't realize the userland threads implementations on -current and : | -stable differed that much. Good luck! : : 'Good luck!' : : I keep getting that. I wonder if that's an omen. Yes. However, now is a good time to do the backport, because there's a lot of work to move away from the userland model to a user/kernel split using kse. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message