Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:39:02 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Bernard.Steiner@germany.eu.net Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: couple of bugs in 2.0R Message-ID: <199504181139.EAA00249@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Apr 95 13:23:01 %2B0200." <199504181123.NAA03844@qwerty.Germany.EU.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> currently is could affect the problem at all (the interrupt should occur i > n > less than 100ms no matter what happens). > >Hmm. Very strange, indeed. Note, however, that the kernel reported the >problems in the exact sequence given above, i.e. >first stray irq 11 and then ed0 timeout; both at a snap of a finger's time >from ifconfig ed0 up. > >It works now with the watchdog at 20; I've re-tried the original kernel with a >watchdog set to 2, and that failed. > >Is there anything I should do in order to help track this down, or just set >the watchdog to 20 which doesn't make sense but works (note: there wasn't even >a two second latency in accessing the ethernet) ? What about other values? ...such as 3? Also, should I assume that your ed0 is on irq 11? -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504181139.EAA00249>