Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:24:13 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: "Dag-Erling =?utf-8?q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: core@freeebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: away Message-ID: <200603311624.13871.davidxu@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <861wwktd5r.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <200603300730.35065.davidxu@freebsd.org> <861wwktd5r.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=E5=9C=A8 Thursday 30 March 2006 18:55=EF=BC=8CDag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav Wro= te=EF=BC=9A > At the tail end of two days spent immersed in libthr, I sniped at you > on -committers. That was wrong. I understand that you were insulted. > I compounded my mistake by not apologizing immediately. I'm not > trying to defend that. >=20 > To spell it out plainly, for the record: David, what I wrote to you on > -committers was unfair and unprofessional, and I apologize. >=20 > However, I do not understand how things developed from there. I tried > to start a technical discussion with you on -threads, explaining what > I thought was wrong with libthr, hoping that you would understand my > concerns, and hoping to work with you to correct and improve the code. > This did not work out. Perhaps you had already made up your mind to > leave; perhaps you were too hurt to read anything but insult into > anything I wrote. >=20 > I am not trying to rush you, as you implied, and I would not commit my > patch without your approval; if I did, I'd be out on my arse faster > than you can say "backout war", and with good reason. > ... I accept your apology, it is not my intention to keep so long time without an clear answer, I just was a bit sad. I received lots of mail (many are in private), thanks everyone who sent mai= l=20 to me and gave me very good comments, most are encouragement, philosophic ideas. Regards, David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603311624.13871.davidxu>