Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 21:02:11 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Simon Shapiro <Shimon@i-Connect.Net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Good Lord, Commercial Linux Message-ID: <19971004210211.32240@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.970930205002.Shimon@i-Connect.Net>; from Simon Shapiro on Tue, Sep 30, 1997 at 08:50:02PM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970930190407.198C-100000@counterintelligence.ml.org> <XFMail.970930205002.Shimon@i-Connect.Net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi ! On Tue, Sep 30, 1997 at 08:50:02PM -0700, Simon Shapiro wrote: > I still like FreeBSD installation better. The rest is pretty much > the same to me. Can't understand this. Could you please explain it a bit more ? Based on my own experience I can't follow here... > Kernel-wise, I think i trust FreeBSD kernel better than Linux, > although performance is, well, six of this, half a dozen of the > other; Both are tuned very well. Could you please explain this a little more verbose as well. So you are saying that FreeBSD has about half the performance as Linux ? You're kidding ;-) Or did you compare things like the speed of rm -rf on a large directory tree without recognizing, that FreeBSD doesn't do asynchronous I/O to a file system as default ?! Please facts here. -- Andreas Klemm powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD'' andreas@klemm.gtn.com - http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html andreas@FreeBSD.ORG - http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/benches.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971004210211.32240>