Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:51:47 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Antoine Brodin <antoine.brodin@laposte.net> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Stack saving/tracing functionality. Message-ID: <9261.1118346707@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:18:29 %2B0200." <20050608221829.75c2de12.antoine.brodin@laposte.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20050608221829.75c2de12.antoine.brodin@laposte.net>, Antoine Brodin writes: >Hi, > > >With Jeff@'s help, I implemented stack saving/tracing functionality. Thankyou! >Another question: Since the stack saving/tracing functionality depends >on ddb, should kern/subr_stack.c be moved to ddb/stack.c and >sys/stack.h to ddb/stack.h? No. This code should be compiled in as standard so that any panic prints a stacktrace on the console, also for non-KDB kernels. A sysctl to enable grepping a backtrace from core-dumping processes would be wonderful as well. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9261.1118346707>