From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 10:00:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF46616A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59D243D1F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6UA0gVq085012 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:42 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6UA0gt1085011; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:42 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:42 GMT Message-Id: <200407301000.i6UA0gt1085011@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: SAKUMA takayuki Subject: Re: misc/69788: The processing result of strtoul() cannot judge whether it is an error. X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: SAKUMA takayuki List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:43 -0000 The following reply was made to PR misc/69788; it has been noted by GNATS. From: SAKUMA takayuki To: sos22@cantab.net Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, sos22@srcf.ucam.org Subject: Re: misc/69788: The processing result of strtoul() cannot judge whether it is an error. Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:51:15 +0900 (JST) > > 2nd strtoul() will success, but errno == ERANGE. > > Is it necessary to set errno as 0 before calling 2nd strtoul() ? > Yes: a succesful library call leaves errno unchanged, rather than > setting it to 0 (usually). I understand. Please close bug report as my mistake. Thank you. ------ takayuki@finet.fujitsu.com