From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 13:40:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CC31065671 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from nskntmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0FA8FC21 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.188.162.219]) by nskntmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080819134018.MXWE12877.nskntmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:40:18 +0000 Received: from areilly.bpa.nu ([124.188.162.219]) by nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080819134018.BVPV29987.nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com@areilly.bpa.nu> for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:40:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 86251 invoked by uid 501); 19 Aug 2008 13:40:05 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:40:05 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly To: Jeff Roberson Message-ID: <20080819134005.GA85664@duncan.reilly.home> References: <20080819025019.GA27997@duncan.reilly.home> <20080818215813.H952@desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080818215813.H952@desktop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150201.48AACD42.00B6,ss=1,fgs=0 Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE problem: slow single processor, realtime prio vs network stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:40:21 -0000 On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:00:12PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote: > Can you tell me what % cpu the audio application uses while running? Have > you tried nice -20 instead of rtprio? It's currently using about 10%, maybe a bit more. I expect it to get heavier as I add more to it. I have hopes of it continuing to work even at 60 to 80% of CPU. I haven't tried nice -20 because I don't want the priority to drift or change, which is something that I thought the normal levels did. I'll give it a go though, and report back. Cheers, Andrew