Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:34:50 -1000
From:      Robert Marella <hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: favor
Message-ID:  <1107650090.5213.9.camel@p4>
In-Reply-To: <1485510257.20050205055221@wanadoo.fr>
References:  <4203F451.9070307@cis.strath.ac.uk> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNGEEAFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <205350680.20050205043947@wanadoo.fr> <200502042343.39455.m.hauber@mchsi.com> <1485510257.20050205055221@wanadoo.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 05:52 +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Mike Hauber writes:

<snip much legal mumbo jumbo and speculation, err mostly the latter>

> The cat is being pushed back into the bag rather rapidly. The legal
> profession was slow to apply the law to the Internet, but it is learning
> fast. 

To paraphrase the "Bard" "The first thing we do, let's kill all the
lawyers...except mine".

Am I the only one longing for a freebsd-legal mail list that I will not
subscribe to?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1107650090.5213.9.camel>