Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:48:10 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> Cc: Prafulla Deuskar <pdeuskar@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fwd: mbuf chain Message-ID: <20020925124810.B50200@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <200209251939.g8PJdjr10039@ambrisko.com>; from ambrisko@ambrisko.com on Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:39:45PM -0700 References: <20020924212719.A42295@iguana.icir.org> <200209251939.g8PJdjr10039@ambrisko.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:39:45PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: ... > Various drivers have code to deal with this when the structure > it is putting the frags into runs out :-( See a recent bug fix to > the ste(4) gleaned from the fxp(4). This type of problem is probably > lurking in other drivers. Unfortunately the ste(4) driver siliently which suggests that we should definitely try to modify sbappend() and/or possibly sbcompress to reduce the fragment count to reasonably small values even in presence of very small writes. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020925124810.B50200>