From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 17 12:49:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FED91065677 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:49:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC88E8FC1B for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2HCnOPv057850; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:49:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n2HCnO50057847; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:49:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:49:24 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Gr=FCnewald_Micha=EBl?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="1626729238-1278541689-1237294164=:57834" Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: Cooking LLVM in FreeBSD 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:49:34 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1626729238-1278541689-1237294164=:57834 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT > On Ivoras'FreeBSD page, ``What's cooking for FreeBSD 8'' > > http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html LLVM site shows it's something like precompiler+runtime compiling. will it be used that way, or as usual compiler? the first way sound really good (single binary for every arch, and optimized at runtime) but i think it will need HUGE change in system. second would be just a replacement > > one can read about the possible substitution of GCC by LLVM (among other > candidates). Under the assumption that LLVM is selected, would this mean that > FreeBSD will somehow integrate the OCaml compiler? > > Of course OCaml is already in the ports, but if it is somehow integrated in > the base system, there is serious opportunities to write system tools with > this language. > -- > Cheers, > Michaël > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --1626729238-1278541689-1237294164=:57834--