Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 May 2013 09:57:56 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        amd64@FreeBSD.org, toolchain@FreeBSD.org, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com>
Subject:   Re: [CFT] gcc: support for barcelona
Message-ID:  <51A5A6F4.8000501@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <3C29AD82-077D-4E6B-94C7-5D069A130348__27528.1591726982$1369769859$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <51A38CBD.6000702@FreeBSD.org> <E9DC99EF-F2E9-4A5F-8370-36DA25DE2C89@felyko.com> <51A3B8AB.5080808@FreeBSD.org> <521EEFA1-E116-41F5-B618-238E7AA092A8@bsdimp.com> <3C29AD82-077D-4E6B-94C7-5D069A130348__27528.1591726982$1369769859$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 28/05/2013 21:10 David Chisnall said the following:
> On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> 
>> That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd64, there's still
>> many bugs in its ARM support and even more in its MIPS support. There's 0
>> chance it will be gone in 10...
> 
> I disagree.  There is a significant chance that gcc in base will be gone for
> all Tier 1 platforms in 10.0.  There are still some reasons to want gcc
> installed, but there are no compelling reasons to want an ancient version of
> gcc installed on x86[-64] or ARM.  For people who need gcc, the ports
> collection provides a selection of recent versions.

I will try to veto any attempt to do so until at least this bug is fixed:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15662
I am sure that other developers have their favorite bugs too.

In fact, I am of opinion that while such bugs exist gcc should be crowned back
as a default compiler.
-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51A5A6F4.8000501>