From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 15 05:36:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5689E8E7; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f48.google.com (mail-da0-f48.google.com [209.85.210.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFC32F6; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v40so1314840dad.35 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:36:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lnUDobqLKnOrAMzbkTWOGt5w0f+0RRHdF1rqKVfc9Us=; b=UPB2sWwVglwyVYcxSeytDi8OxwcJ4VHcpeIhHNz2DP8mt9ii9TTMAtchNhN9hTSJny mEQZoi0usYMA8S0EHSdiUcrE33+ujnZKkMflO7fIvVg6i2G64pil8QlKQVd42cCvUm+p 74k3MDqFFs7ee6KpeSNPU2ZkdgRfCP1lzRzR5HPCaQY4JAAI1PkAgarJsc3+AKhxkWms GiltW9/IkIv8POVpCV2h4QshiuZPj4le4Ul9BKZ7g4r1RiKf+A0S76RlMe0AWjCOepnP OOE8cot4Le74nQLb1pkeepw8qKKSqK19iYRsrpmtTMJn/+D8gOkBKQspGomzotOEHK0p IxWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.143.99 with SMTP id sd3mr3274840pbb.53.1360906604880; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:36:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.2.65 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:36:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:36:44 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster SUGGEST From: Kevin Oberman To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, awarecons , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:36:51 -0000 On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, awarecons wrote: > >> Firstly, thank you for such nice and handy tool. >> >> Secondly, would suggest you few handy options of portmaster: >> >> - if port fails give it a second try with question 'Retry?'. A user >> may change some influencing options, for e.g. compiler from gcc 4.2 to >> 4.6 or clang, before proceeding new try; >> >> - if port fails give the whole process second try suggesting restart >> from the ascend port 'Retry from the ascend port and reconfigure it?', >> so the user has opportunity to disable failing sibling. >> >> Such options are quite handy for large bunches like x11/gnome2|kde4, >> when one has 300-500 ports to build and wouldn't oblige to restart the >> whole process each time within failure appears. > > > When portmaster fails out, it shows a list of the remaining ports to build. > Dependencies that have already been installed will not be rebuilt if you use > that list. And don't forget the very handy '-R' option. Only works with -r or -f, bu tit will greatly simplify these operations when a build errors out. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com