Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:38:49 +1100
From:      "Jan Mikkelsen" <janm@transactionware.com>
To:        "'Wes Morgan'" <morganw@chemikals.org>, "'Matt Simerson'" <matt@corp.spry.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing.
Message-ID:  <C22DCA4BBFD54E3E9FE96197E64B0788@STUDYPC>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0811170521320.1488@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

Wes Morgan wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, Matt Simerson wrote:
>=20
> > The Areca cards do NOT have the cache enabled by default. I=20
> ordered the=20
> > optional battery and RAM upgrade for my collection of=20
> 1231ML cards. Even with=20
> > the BBWC, the cache is not enabled by default. I had to go=20
> out of my way to=20
> > enable it, on every single controller.
>=20
> Are you using these areca cards successfully with large=20
> arrays? I found a=20
> 1680i card for a decent price and installed it this weekend,=20
> but since=20
> then I'm seeing the raidz2 pool that it's running hang so=20
> frequently that=20
> I can't even trust using it. The hangs occur in both 7-stable and=20
> 8-current with the new ZFS patch. Same exact settings that=20
> have been rock=20
> solid for me before now don't want to work at all. The drives=20
> are just set=20
> as JBOD -- the controller actually defaulted to this, so I=20
> didn't have to=20
> make any real changes in the BIOS.
>=20
> Any tips on your setup? Did you have any similar problems?

I am seeing I/O related lockups on 7.1-PRE with an Areca ARC-1220 =
controller
and eight drives in a RAID-6 array.  The same hardware works fine with =
6.3.

When I run gstat while it is happening I see I/O performance drop and =
the
time to service each write (ms/w) goes up, and then suddenly goes back =
down
to a sensible value.  I have seen it get to about 22000ms.

The system is essentially unusable for writes, which limits the utility =
a
bit.  Reads seem fine.

Is this similar to the behaviour you saw?

Thanks,

Jan Mikkelsen




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C22DCA4BBFD54E3E9FE96197E64B0788>