From owner-freebsd-questions Tue May 2 0:16: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dastor.albury.net.au (dastor.albury.NET.AU [203.15.244.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596E437BA2B; Tue, 2 May 2000 00:15:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nicks@dastor.albury.net.au) Received: (from nicks@localhost) by dastor.albury.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA63379; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:14:58 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from nicks) Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 17:14:57 +1000 From: Nick Slager To: Some Person Cc: freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unreal Tournament Server on FreeBSD... Message-ID: <20000502171457.A62687@albury.net.au> Mail-Followup-To: Some Person , freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20000502064519.90218.qmail@hotmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000502064519.90218.qmail@hotmail.com>; from ntvsunix@hotmail.com on Mon, May 01, 2000 at 11:45:19PM -0700 X-Homer: Whoohooooooo! Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Some Person (ntvsunix@hotmail.com): > Weird question, but I'm not asking for help on how to set it up as I've > already found the info on that. I was just wondering, what type of system > would be required (hardware wise) to run a dedicated UT server? Nothing > else, other than UT serving. > > It would be on an ADSL line, maybe 10 users? P166MMX 64/96 Meg RAM. X is > completly optional for me (unless it's need for UT server, not sure yet) and > I wouldn't even run anything really other than UT server on it. > We found UT to be roughly comparable to the dedicated Quake III server running under linux emulation. I used to run the Q3A server, X, enlightenment and 10 or so xterms on my notebook: Celeron 366, 64Mb RAM. With 7 or 8 people playing on the server, and me doing other work, load averages were consistently around 0.6-0.7. It did start to groan slightly when I fired up Netscape, but Netscape's big and a memory hog. Try that on micros~1 :-) > If so, would it be slow and/or what would be better, 3.4-stable or > 4.0-stable for this? > Our live Q3A/UT server runs 3.4-stable, and we haven't had any issues. No production experience with 4.0 and UT. Regards, Nick. -- From a Sun Microsystems bug report (#4102680): "Workaround: don't pound on the mouse like a wild monkey." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message