Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 21:09:35 -0500 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> To: Juergen Nickelsen <jnickelsen@acm.org> Cc: Kris Kirby <kris@hiwaay.net>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Windows 2000 isn't that smart, but everything else is Message-ID: <20000215210935.C45552@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> In-Reply-To: <x7g0uuuaak.fsf@goting.jn.berlin.snafu.de>; from jnickelsen@acm.org on Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 09:42:11AM %2B0100 References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10002141838530.10619-100000@barricuda.bsd.nws.net> <x7g0uuuaak.fsf@goting.jn.berlin.snafu.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Juergen Nickelsen wrote: > Kris Kirby <kris@hiwaay.net> writes: > > > > arp: 10.1.1.15 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:40:05:4d:11:af on ed0 > > > arp: 10.1.1.15 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:40:05:4d:11:af on ed0 > > > arp: 10.1.1.15 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:40:05:4d:11:af on ed0 > > > > This is supposedly "Retail" Win2K, but it has no idea where to send ARPs. > > Lucky for it that the gateway machine is connected across both LANs. :-) > > I saw this a lot from a FreeBSD box (3.4-RELEASE) that was connected > to the same Ethernet segment with two NICs (in different logical > networks). It really got on my nerves, and Windows 2000 was not > involved. Shouldn't put two NICs from one host on one physical LAN. Hurts network performance. I have yet to hear a good reason to do it. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000215210935.C45552>