From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 12 03:09:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B9E106566B; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2008C8FC08; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so4206559wwg.31 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:09:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w/JA5/f9B4MtqZoClXrq7yUsJFIMa0lgE51naElh+Dc=; b=BRCgBrDmSX8dTxZHwEammfFh02VcyFK68+8J3wMJU/UKGBnzld5cHrXLNTcbrdL6pM 3J7+FkH6+uTuccsHi6j739Cr8bsQrNJMe19g/X4zluQWpnrtZE3jDQE6ygw0OiF5ftOh o+n+pO/TXqxPzmhTACXcpnztYfMseGDJfRwRY= Received: by 10.216.135.40 with SMTP id t40mr2741901wei.41.1321065738420; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:42:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.21.133 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:41:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111111183724.5712e1e2.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111111143115.5bf5d195.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20111111181823.089d72be.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4EBDDABE.5030304@FreeBSD.org> <20111111183724.5712e1e2.stas@FreeBSD.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:41:47 -0500 Message-ID: To: Stanislav Sedov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Steve Wills , ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What changed? (gem command missing in 1.9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:09:32 -0000 On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > I believe it might do. =C2=A0I'm not sure though you can run depend on so= mething > that build depends on you, so it needs testing. Even if it "works" I'd like to see if we could find an alternate solution. These sort of changes seem like they are designed to break things. --=20 Eitan Adler