From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jun 12 07:44:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA00433
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 07:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from plains.NoDak.edu (tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu [134.129.111.64])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA00428
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 07:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from tinguely@localhost)
	by plains.NoDak.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA28701;
	Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:44:17 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:44:17 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu>
Message-Id: <199706121444.JAA28701@plains.NoDak.edu>
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, zgabor@CoDe.hu
Subject: Re: natd and 2.1.7 ?
Cc: gvw@brainaid.diginet.de
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

we still run NAT with IPFILTER 3.1.2 on FreeBSD 2.1.7/2.1.7.1. The problem
with this NAT is that you need proxies for services suchas ftp.

It appears NATD is much better than NAT in IPFILTER, and is worth the
upgrade to FreeBSD 2.2.2.
--mark.