From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 17 09:34:29 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1682A16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:34:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DDE3343D31; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:34:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (davidxu@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2H9YO8q023083;
	Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:34:28 GMT
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <42394F22.9060100@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:34:26 +0800
From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <5641.1111050847@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <5641.1111050847@critter.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW/PERF] kern_thread.c tid allocation patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:34:29 -0000

Thread ID should start from (PID_MAX + 1).

David Xu

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>While investigating a Coverity report (false alarm btw) I noticed
>that kern_thread has a lot of code for allocating thread id's.
>
>This patch uses subr_unit instead.
>
>I would expect thread create/destroy performance to increase on
>systems where there are many threads, and would be interested
>if anybody can measure any difference.
>
>Poul-Henning
>  
>