From owner-freebsd-mobile  Wed Mar  8 18:57:54 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0A337B8C4
	for <freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  8 Mar 2000 18:57:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA20126;
	Wed, 8 Mar 2000 19:29:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 19:29:25 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Lance Woodson <lance@woodson.com>
Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Why PAO?
Message-ID: <20000308192925.C14279@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <38C70FBE.C0541628@woodson.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <38C70FBE.C0541628@woodson.com>; from lance@woodson.com on Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 08:43:10PM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

* Lance Woodson <lance@woodson.com> [000308 19:14] wrote:
> First off, I really appreciate the work that PAO does and I hope this is
> not a touchy subject however...
> 
> Why is there PAO?  
> 
> Can we integrate their work into FreeBSD and then have them work
> directly with the FreeBSD codebase?  Are they willing?  Is FreeBSD
> willing?  Would this be feasable?
> 
> Thanks for any insight that might help to appease my soul,
> Lance Woodson

I'm pretty sure several members of the PAO team have been given
commit privledges to the main tree.

-Alfred


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message