From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 3 09:16:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA03710 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:16:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA03702 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:16:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA19280; Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:15:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199804031715.JAA19280@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Peter Edwards cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bcopy implementation In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Apr 1998 17:08:04 +0100." <35250964.F89A1631@isocor.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 09:15:51 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It would be nice if someone could measure a worldstone with a modified libc's bcopy vs standard libc's bcopy. Cheers, Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message