From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 14 22:14:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D1816A41C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:14:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [209.89.70.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0365843D1D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Received: from [192.168.15.2] (d216-232-211-96.bchsia.telus.net [216.232.211.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by orthanc.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5EMDo79099474; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:13:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) In-Reply-To: <42AF374F.3000705@offmyserver.com> References: <200504262010.49509@harrymail> <20050429200029.GC232@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <200506141824.17451@harrymail> <20050614185923.GA12375@dragon.NUXI.org> <42AF374F.3000705@offmyserver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lyndon Nerenberg Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:13:43 -0700 To: "Devon H. O'Dell" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-DCC-neonova-Metrics: orthanc.ca 1127; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on orthanc.ca X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:44:48 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groff alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:14:17 -0000 On Jun 14, 2005, at 1:00 PM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Would troff/nroff/ps/pdf utilities from Plan 9 be usable? The > license isn't as restrictive. But probably better than what Sun is using. The Plan 9 troff has the advantage of being UTF-8 savvy. It has the disadvantage of requiring the Plan 9 runtime compatibility libraries be brought along. I don't have time right this minute to investigate further. Maybe in a week or two.