From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 15 21:35:42 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3674C16A46B for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD25513C46B for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 7712 invoked by uid 399); 15 Oct 2007 21:35:40 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO slave.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2007 21:35:40 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:35:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: <20071012081105.C6043@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Message-ID: References: <200710120803.l9C83pLM093240@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071012081105.C6043@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.own.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:35:42 -0000 On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Is there any chance to get bind back w/o threading support? I guess > the question is more to Doug than to you. My perspective on this is that the BIND in the base should have a solid default configuration that fits the needs of the majority of our users, and anything else can be done with the port which has knobs for things like threads/no threads and replacing the base install. > Going with a port for this means supporting the ports infrastructure > respectively an extra installation procedure. Nothing that can't be done > just extra pain;-) What I did when I was at Yahoo! was to create a package on a master server and then install the package on all my clients. In fact, that's why I developed the "replace base" code in the first place. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection