From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Apr 23 10:41:08 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA03038
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 10:41:08 -0700
Received: from shell1.best.com (root@shell1.best.com [204.156.128.10])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA03029
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 10:41:06 -0700
Received: from geli.clusternet (rcarter.vip.best.com [204.156.137.2]) by shell1.best.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id KAA19443; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 10:40:47 -0701
Received: (from rcarter@localhost) by geli.clusternet (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA10084; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 10:40:00 -0700
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 1995 10:40:00 -0700
From: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@geli.com>
Message-Id: <199504231740.KAA10084@geli.clusternet>
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org, jkh@violet.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: benchmark hell..
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Well, the real measure would be Linux 1.2++ and FreeBSD from
mid March on.  And file copy on the Barracuda isn't so hot,
I only get ~3.5 MB/s on bonnie out of mine, so I suspect
that the advantage there is real.  That leaves just the execl
and pipe based context switch to check out.  It's been
years since I ran these, aren't there a lot more tests?

Russell