Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 May 1999 12:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To:        Hristo Grigorov <hristo@bg.freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: upgrade
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.03.9905271227120.16577-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905260949040.4426-100000@nic.bse.bg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 May 1999, Hristo Grigorov wrote:

> Greetings,
> 
> what's recommended for system upgrade:
> 
> 2.2.8 -> 3.1 -> 3.2
> 
> or
> 
> 2.2.8 -> 3.2

If you plan on doing a binary upgrade, it doesn't matter either way.

If you're doing a source upgrade, going to 3.1 is guaranteed to work, then
build 3.2.

Doug White                               
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | www.freebsd.org



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.03.9905271227120.16577-100000>