From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Apr 10 14:49:16 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA02654
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA02648
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA01531; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: proff@suburbia.net
cc: nate@mt.sri.com, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, terry@lambert.org,
        sef@kithrup.com, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: on the subject of changes to -RELEASEs... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Apr 1997 18:52:44 +1000."
             <19970410085245.11057.qmail@suburbia.net> 
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:46:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1527.860708793@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> A reliable union layer would solve all these cases where one has
> a standard "template" file that may or may not receive modification.

And that's where you lost me.  I was more interested in real solutions,
Julian. :-)

					Jordan