From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 17:20:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B21316A420 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 17:20:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cajfox@mail.bg) Received: from mx1.mail.bg (mx1.mail.bg [193.201.172.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2160143D5D for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 17:20:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cajfox@mail.bg) Received: from localhost (web1.mail.bg [193.201.172.98]) by mx1.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1409000492 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:20:18 +0200 (EET) Received: from 83.228.54.198 ([83.228.54.198]) by mail.bg (mail.bG Webmail 4.0.1) with HTTP for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:20:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1133803218.ce6b99867e233@mail.bg> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:20:18 +0200 From: cajfox@mail.bg To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: mail.bG Webmail 4.0-cvs X-Originating-IP: 83.228.54.198 Subject: CD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:20:20 -0000 Why is my CD Burner detected by the kernel, but when I run, for example, K3b - it doesn't? K3b doesn't even detect that I have a CD-ROM. I'm running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE. Here is the entry that shows up for my CDRom when I type dmesg in the Konsole. acd0: CDRW at ata0-slave UDMA33 ----------------------------- =C7=E0=E4=E0=E2=E0=F2 =F1=E5 =EC=F0=E0=F7=ED=E8 =E8 =F2=F0=F3=E4=ED=E8 =E2= =F0=E5=EC=E5=ED=E0: =D5=C0=D0=C8 =CF=CE=D2=DA=D0 =C8 =CE=C3=CD=C5=CD=C8=DF=D2 =C1=CE=CA=C0=CB =F1=E0=EC=EE =E2 =EA=E8=ED=E0=F2=E0! http://www.kino.dir.bg/film.php?id=3D5389 From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 19:49:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEC716A41F for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:49:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D949F43D75 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:49:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from wcborstel.demon.nl ([83.160.142.57]:17959 helo=[192.168.1.9]) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EjML2-000Ose-JQ; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:49:28 +0000 Message-ID: <43949910.9090009@wcborstel.nl> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:46:24 +0100 From: Jorn Argelo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051120) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cajfox@mail.bg, hardware@freebsd.org References: <1133803218.ce6b99867e233@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: <1133803218.ce6b99867e233@mail.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: CD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:49:44 -0000 cajfox@mail.bg wrote: >Why is my CD Burner detected by the kernel, but when I run, >for example, K3b - it doesn't? K3b doesn't even detect that >I have a CD-ROM. >I'm running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE. >Here is the entry that shows up for my CDRom when I type >dmesg in the Konsole. >acd0: CDRW at ata0-slave UDMA33 > > As far as I know, K3B only supports SCSI burners. You can get around this by compiling atapicam into your kernel, which provides SCSI emulation for your CD burner. >----------------------------- > >Çàäàâàò ñå ìðà÷íè è òðóäíè âðåìåíà: > >ÕÀÐÈ ÏÎÒÚÐ È ÎÃÍÅÍÈßÒ ÁÎÊÀË >ñàìî â êèíàòà! >http://www.kino.dir.bg/film.php?id=5389 > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 19:59:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DA516A41F; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:59:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9F343D8E; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:59:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.sv.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jB5Jxef0079726; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:59:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id jB5JwsKs013974; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:58:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) id jB5Jwswe013971; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:58:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:58:54 -0800 From: Joe Rhett To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20051205195854.GA13194@svcolo.com> References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <200511181347.20249.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051201090110.GA23495@svcolo.com> <200512011152.34391.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512011152.34391.jhb@freebsd.org> Organization: svcolo.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:59:47 -0000 > On Thursday 01 December 2005 04:01 am, Joe Rhett wrote: > > Okay, so how do we go about fixing it? I'm more than happy to supply debug > > and/or test systems to work on this... On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:52:33AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > Warner (imp@) has started tinkering on fixing the whole hint mechanism to > interact a lot better with ACPI and PnP BIOS and we've had some brief > discussions on IRC about how to fix it, but I'm not sure a real fix would be > in the pipeline soon as it's a rather big pile of stuff to untangle to get it > all working correctly. Any way to join this and help? It's a fairly major problem for us. -- Joe Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 19:59:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DA516A41F; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:59:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9F343D8E; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:59:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.sv.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jB5Jxef0079726; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:59:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id jB5JwsKs013974; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:58:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) id jB5Jwswe013971; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:58:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:58:54 -0800 From: Joe Rhett To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20051205195854.GA13194@svcolo.com> References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <200511181347.20249.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051201090110.GA23495@svcolo.com> <200512011152.34391.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512011152.34391.jhb@freebsd.org> Organization: svcolo.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:59:47 -0000 > On Thursday 01 December 2005 04:01 am, Joe Rhett wrote: > > Okay, so how do we go about fixing it? I'm more than happy to supply debug > > and/or test systems to work on this... On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:52:33AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > Warner (imp@) has started tinkering on fixing the whole hint mechanism to > interact a lot better with ACPI and PnP BIOS and we've had some brief > discussions on IRC about how to fix it, but I'm not sure a real fix would be > in the pipeline soon as it's a rather big pile of stuff to untangle to get it > all working correctly. Any way to join this and help? It's a fairly major problem for us. -- Joe Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 20:06:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D1F16A41F; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:06:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ACA43D76; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:06:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.sv.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jB5K6cew080215; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:06:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id jB5K5kXb015949; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:05:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) id jB5K5kSw015947; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:05:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:05:46 -0800 From: Joe Rhett To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <200511171030.36633.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051117220358.GA65127@svcolo.com> <20051130181757.GA29686@svcolo.com> <20051201204625.W41849@delplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051201204625.W41849@delplex.bde.org> Organization: svcolo.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin , freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:06:57 -0000 On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:58:04PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > It's not clear that disabling in the BIOS should disable for all OSes. What? That's a fairly weird interpretation. If I want to disable inside a given OS, I do that inside the OS. If I want to disable for _ALL_ OSes, then I disable in the BIOS. What reasonable logic can argue otherwise? > Don't know. I avoid ACPI if possible :-). I suspect that FreeBSD can see > ACPI tables but not all BIOS tables, so any soft disabling in the BIOS gets > lost. Can you really use everything without ACPI? What is lost by disabling ACPI? Don't you lose power-down support at the least? (I did look for a FAQ on ACPI and found darn little) -- Joe Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 20:06:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hardware@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D1F16A41F; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:06:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ACA43D76; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:06:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.sv.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jB5K6cew080215; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:06:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id jB5K5kXb015949; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:05:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) id jB5K5kSw015947; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:05:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:05:46 -0800 From: Joe Rhett To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <200511171030.36633.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051117220358.GA65127@svcolo.com> <20051130181757.GA29686@svcolo.com> <20051201204625.W41849@delplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051201204625.W41849@delplex.bde.org> Organization: svcolo.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin , freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:06:57 -0000 On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:58:04PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > It's not clear that disabling in the BIOS should disable for all OSes. What? That's a fairly weird interpretation. If I want to disable inside a given OS, I do that inside the OS. If I want to disable for _ALL_ OSes, then I disable in the BIOS. What reasonable logic can argue otherwise? > Don't know. I avoid ACPI if possible :-). I suspect that FreeBSD can see > ACPI tables but not all BIOS tables, so any soft disabling in the BIOS gets > lost. Can you really use everything without ACPI? What is lost by disabling ACPI? Don't you lose power-down support at the least? (I did look for a FAQ on ACPI and found darn little) -- Joe Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 20:07:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE5116A420; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222D043D62; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:07:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.sv.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jB5K7SfW080249; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:07:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id jB5K79WK016372; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:07:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) id jB5K79a3016370; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:07:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:07:09 -0800 From: Joe Rhett To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20051205200709.GC13194@svcolo.com> References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <20051117220358.GA65127@svcolo.com> <20051130181757.GA29686@svcolo.com> <200512011153.50287.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512011153.50287.jhb@freebsd.org> Organization: svcolo.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:07:43 -0000 On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:53:49AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > No, it is reading it right. When you disable a device in ACPI it merely > doesn't assign resources to it. The OS can assign resources to it on its own > though and re-enable the device. FreeBSD currently doesn't implement enough > to get that right though. So what's involved in simply having it say Found : disabled in BIOS instead of half a dozen complaints for each disabled device? -- Joe Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 20:23:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF0216A420 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from axvpaa@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F258443D8B for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:23:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from axvpaa@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so958836wxc for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:23:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=JYHoLyDr+FzGJE3RQyDCghi8+3B22IgHoYcjwr5tjEnBgOTqTAp9iw2ThYLbz8hO91kpUJkz2DysWfolzWbjeYDAcpvBMz4+7OEy4qbQp/y9Cg9gtmPk4psM3mGhhesrJWtv9RIBsE1/2qqrhG2KvcWQMsNnvBcyT9F84GcXI2k= Received: by 10.70.17.19 with SMTP id 19mr6315474wxq; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:23:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.15.6 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:23:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1adab9c20512051223u5a893295lcaa8253a60d4311e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:23:00 -0500 From: alexander p To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ugen0: MicroTouch Systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:23:05 -0000 Howdy, i have a dell e153fpt usb model touchscreen monitor that im trying to get i= t work with freebsd w/o luck so far. i can figure out a way to make touchscreen part to work with freebsd. freebsd reports: ugen0: MicroTouch Systems, Inc. 3M USB Touchscreen - Dell, rev 1.10/3.40, addr 2. any idea? tia, alex From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 21:23:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8101D16A422; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:23:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from speedfactory.net (mail6.speedfactory.net [66.23.216.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2199443D45; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:23:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (unverified [66.23.211.162]) by speedfactory.net (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 3208972 for multiple; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:21:53 -0500 Received: from localhost (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB5LNZPv041669; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:23:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:22:40 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <20051201204625.W41849@delplex.bde.org> <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512051522.41965.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=1653887525 Cc: Joe Rhett , hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:23:47 -0000 On Monday 05 December 2005 03:05 pm, Joe Rhett wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:58:04PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > > It's not clear that disabling in the BIOS should disable for all OSes. > > What? That's a fairly weird interpretation. If I want to disable inside a > given OS, I do that inside the OS. If I want to disable for _ALL_ OSes, > then I disable in the BIOS. What reasonable logic can argue otherwise? The BIOS doesn't say "X is disabled", it just doesn't have any resources setup for X. One of the few things the BIOS can say "X is disabled" for is CPUs, which is what the Hyperthreading knob in the BIOS does, it just flags HT CPUs as disabled in the MADT table. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 21:23:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8101D16A422; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:23:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from speedfactory.net (mail6.speedfactory.net [66.23.216.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2199443D45; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:23:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (unverified [66.23.211.162]) by speedfactory.net (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 3208972 for multiple; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:21:53 -0500 Received: from localhost (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB5LNZPv041669; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:23:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:22:40 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <20051201204625.W41849@delplex.bde.org> <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512051522.41965.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=1653887525 Cc: Joe Rhett , hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:23:47 -0000 On Monday 05 December 2005 03:05 pm, Joe Rhett wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:58:04PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > > It's not clear that disabling in the BIOS should disable for all OSes. > > What? That's a fairly weird interpretation. If I want to disable inside a > given OS, I do that inside the OS. If I want to disable for _ALL_ OSes, > then I disable in the BIOS. What reasonable logic can argue otherwise? The BIOS doesn't say "X is disabled", it just doesn't have any resources setup for X. One of the few things the BIOS can say "X is disabled" for is CPUs, which is what the Hyperthreading knob in the BIOS does, it just flags HT CPUs as disabled in the MADT table. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 21:24:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B000716A430 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:24:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from speedfactory.net (mail6.speedfactory.net [66.23.216.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6DC43DA6 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:24:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (unverified [66.23.211.162]) by speedfactory.net (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 3208977 for multiple; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:21:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB5LNZPx041669; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:23:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Joe Rhett Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:26:47 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <200512011153.50287.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051205200709.GC13194@svcolo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051205200709.GC13194@svcolo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512051526.48117.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=1653887525 Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:24:59 -0000 On Monday 05 December 2005 03:07 pm, Joe Rhett wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:53:49AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > No, it is reading it right. When you disable a device in ACPI it merely > > doesn't assign resources to it. The OS can assign resources to it on its > > own though and re-enable the device. FreeBSD currently doesn't implement > > enough to get that right though. > > So what's involved in simply having it say > Found : disabled in BIOS > > instead of half a dozen complaints for each disabled device? There's no disabled flag. If you have PNP OS set to yes in your BIOS, it is free to leave any devices not needed for booting unconfigured (like printer ports, serial ports, etc.) and there is no way for the OS to know if the BIOS didn't alloc resources because it is disabled or because the BIOS was just lazy. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 20:41:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FEE16A420 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:41:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cajfox@mail.bg) Received: from mx1.mail.bg (mx1.mail.bg [193.201.172.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4040D43D88 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:41:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cajfox@mail.bg) Received: from localhost (web1.mail.bg [193.201.172.98]) by mx1.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6353900067E for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:41:43 +0200 (EET) Received: from 83.228.54.132 ([83.228.54.132]) by mail.bg (mail.bG Webmail 4.0.1) with HTTP for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:41:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1133988103.39511f5299f9e@mail.bg> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:41:43 +0200 From: cajfox@mail.bg To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: mail.bG Webmail 4.0-cvs X-Originating-IP: 83.228.54.132 Subject: USB Mass Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:41:49 -0000 I have the USB support working, my FreeBSD system has detected the device, dmesg detects it and all looks fine. But when I type: mount_msdosfs /dev/da0 /mnt/usb a message appears telling me: mount_msdosfs: /dev/da0: Device not configured. I don't know what to do. I have searched in google and found that other people had the same problem too, but I didn't find a solution, nor even a lead. What can I do? -------------------------------------- =C1=E5=E7=EF=EB=E0=F2=ED=E0=F2=E0 =EF=EE=F9=E0 =E2 mail.bg =E2=E5=F7=E5 =E5 = 1GB! From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 20:59:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B4616A41F for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:59:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: from web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E49543D62 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:59:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 59834 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Dec 2005 20:59:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=3mYHmq3mRYCm0PegEfLNVEWyu9CGeHPUBa1sIBn9WqWtrrmdpeS5gxy/QbRsDzmQoPT56Nr36/5Fr4xRD8T38XxsscoZ3+YUczk0ikULR0AfUKyVCHhSTrotHoIVRRairPf0hCcUAmR9a+EFvjIk+1ERuzP889gRj2E1kQs7Hn0= ; Message-ID: <20051207205931.59832.qmail@web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.54.79.18] by web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:59:31 PST Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:59:31 -0800 (PST) From: Arne Woerner To: cajfox@mail.bg, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1133988103.39511f5299f9e@mail.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: USB Mass Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:59:47 -0000 --- cajfox@mail.bg wrote: > [...] > message appears telling me: > mount_msdosfs: /dev/da0: Device not configured. > I don't know what to do. I have searched > [...] I had a similar problem (I do not remember the error message). A camcontrol reset 0:0:0 (0:0:0 is to be substituted apropriately (see `camcontrol devlist` if necessary)) helped quite good... I hope it helps in your case, too... :-) -Arne __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 21:21:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CEF16A41F for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:21:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cajfox@mail.bg) Received: from mx1.mail.bg (mx1.mail.bg [193.201.172.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0954E43D4C for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:21:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cajfox@mail.bg) Received: from localhost (web1.mail.bg [193.201.172.98]) by mx1.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8109000745 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:21:38 +0200 (EET) Received: from 83.228.54.132 ([83.228.54.132]) by mail.bg (mail.bG Webmail 4.0.1) with HTTP for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:21:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1133990498.22c9f1d232201@mail.bg> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:21:38 +0200 From: cajfox@mail.bg To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: mail.bG Webmail 4.0-cvs X-Originating-IP: 83.228.54.132 Subject: Printer Setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:21:49 -0000 I have a problem with the setup of a Canon S200x printer. The kernel detects the printer at ulpt0. I read the HANDBOOK - to test the printer I must type lptest > /dev/ulpt0, which I did. But nothing happend and I don't know what to do because I read many articles about other people having the same problem, but nobody told me how to solve it. What are the things that I miss, if any? Someone on a Forum wrote that, because lptest supports only old models of printers, I must use ghostscript (which I don't know how to use) or another similar program to test the printer. I installed CUPS, but when I configured it and everything looked fine, I pressed "print" and a progress bar (on GIMP) showed up, reached the end and disappeared. I think that this means the system send a call to the printer. Is this what it means? But the printer (like with lptest) did not respond. I have plugged in all the cables. HELP! -------------------------------------- =C1=E5=E7=EF=EB=E0=F2=ED=E0=F2=E0 =EF=EE=F9=E0 =E2 mail.bg =E2=E5=F7=E5 =E5 = 1GB! From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 22:41:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A3A16A41F for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: from web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08B5143D88 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:41:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 92167 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Dec 2005 22:41:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=x4F9wzEvQZlChUv6+mPcgkZGFgRQRxOi47Mkyqs1JyUJV+B2idKB59wYvyI9LUPpDBl0zRBkzw63Bfv306BkmrBdnvvPsejKxcjQrYo1RBMxVkeyFh//5z1cGdvyncqKTV0FauQej+SWwdLUc/wDw1EPFWW2PDs8lnFUWke3EZY= ; Message-ID: <20051207224156.92165.qmail@web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.54.79.18] by web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:41:56 PST Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:41:56 -0800 (PST) From: Arne Woerner To: cajfox@mail.bg, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1133990498.22c9f1d232201@mail.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Printer Setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:41:57 -0000 Hi! --- cajfox@mail.bg wrote: > I have a problem with the setup of a Canon S200x > printer. > I don't know that printer (I use an USB HP via ghostscript hpijs driver and that lpr print system (/etc/printcap)). But I have found some links, that might be useful in your case: http://www.ghostscript.com/ http://www.ghostscript.com/doc/AFPL/8.50/Devices.htm#IJS http://www.linuxprinting.org/ijs/ http://www.linuxprinting.org/printer_list.cgi http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_driver.cgi?driver=gimp-print&fromprinter=Canon-S200 http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/p_Supported_Printers.php3 I use gimp-2.2 from ports in FBSD R6.0 and it offers in File/Print/Setup Printer a printer named S200... But nothing about the "X" in S200x... :-(( Maybe you want to install graphics/gimp and graphics/ghostscript-gnu via ports, too (I think that installs print/gimp-print automatically)? I hope that helps... Bye Arne __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 04:13:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CE816A41F; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:13:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailout1.pacific.net.au (mailout1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC7743D81; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:13:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.87]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jB84D2sO024837; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:13:02 +1100 Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jB84D0f1001637; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:13:01 +1100 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:13:00 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@delplex.bde.org To: Joe Rhett In-Reply-To: <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> Message-ID: <20051208145124.C63825@delplex.bde.org> References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <200511171030.36633.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051117220358.GA65127@svcolo.com> <20051130181757.GA29686@svcolo.com> <20051201204625.W41849@delplex.bde.org> <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin , freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:13:11 -0000 On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Joe Rhett wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:58:04PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: >> It's not clear that disabling in the BIOS should disable for all OSes. > > What? That's a fairly weird interpretation. If I want to disable inside a > given OS, I do that inside the OS. If I want to disable for _ALL_ OSes, > then I disable in the BIOS. What reasonable logic can argue otherwise? The BIOS might not be layered under _all_ OSes, either due to its design or implementation, or OSes not understanding how to talk to the BIOS, or there being no way to talk BIOS. >> Don't know. I avoid ACPI if possible :-). I suspect that FreeBSD can see >> ACPI tables but not all BIOS tables, so any soft disabling in the BIOS gets >> lost. > > Can you really use everything without ACPI? What is lost by disabling ACPI? > Don't you lose power-down support at the least? > (I did look for a FAQ on ACPI and found darn little) It's system-dependent. ACPI is now essential for most portable computers. I don't have one , and lose only faster interrupt handing via the APIC on workstations. This is a small loss since the APIC is broken on 1/2 of my systems that have both ACPI and APIC so APIC cannot be configured on one, and the other one doesn't do much interrupt handling or benchmarks thereof so I don't care if it would have faster interrupt handling using APIC. Bruce From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 04:13:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hardware@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CE816A41F; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:13:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailout1.pacific.net.au (mailout1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC7743D81; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:13:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.87]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jB84D2sO024837; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:13:02 +1100 Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jB84D0f1001637; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:13:01 +1100 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:13:00 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@delplex.bde.org To: Joe Rhett In-Reply-To: <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> Message-ID: <20051208145124.C63825@delplex.bde.org> References: <20051117050336.GB67653@svcolo.com> <200511171030.36633.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051117220358.GA65127@svcolo.com> <20051130181757.GA29686@svcolo.com> <20051201204625.W41849@delplex.bde.org> <20051205200546.GB13194@svcolo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin , freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: com1 incorrectly associated with ttyd1, com2 with ttyd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:13:11 -0000 On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Joe Rhett wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:58:04PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: >> It's not clear that disabling in the BIOS should disable for all OSes. > > What? That's a fairly weird interpretation. If I want to disable inside a > given OS, I do that inside the OS. If I want to disable for _ALL_ OSes, > then I disable in the BIOS. What reasonable logic can argue otherwise? The BIOS might not be layered under _all_ OSes, either due to its design or implementation, or OSes not understanding how to talk to the BIOS, or there being no way to talk BIOS. >> Don't know. I avoid ACPI if possible :-). I suspect that FreeBSD can see >> ACPI tables but not all BIOS tables, so any soft disabling in the BIOS gets >> lost. > > Can you really use everything without ACPI? What is lost by disabling ACPI? > Don't you lose power-down support at the least? > (I did look for a FAQ on ACPI and found darn little) It's system-dependent. ACPI is now essential for most portable computers. I don't have one , and lose only faster interrupt handing via the APIC on workstations. This is a small loss since the APIC is broken on 1/2 of my systems that have both ACPI and APIC so APIC cannot be configured on one, and the other one doesn't do much interrupt handling or benchmarks thereof so I don't care if it would have faster interrupt handling using APIC. Bruce From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 04:46:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB5316A41F for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:46:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r11roadster@yahoo.com) Received: from mxsf35.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf35.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC1E43D8B for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r11roadster@yahoo.com) Received: from mxip29a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip29a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.188]) by mxsf35.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB84kGOs000998 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:46:16 -0500 Received: from 68-119-38-069.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com (HELO [192.168.1.67]) ([68.119.38.69]) by mxip29a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2005 23:46:16 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.99,228,1131339600"; d="scan'208"; a="581011828:sNHT16170198" Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.1.371 [267.13.12/193]); Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:46:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4397BA91.8090401@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:46:09 -0500 From: Ronny Hippler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cajfox@mail.bg References: <1133988103.39511f5299f9e@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: <1133988103.39511f5299f9e@mail.bg> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Mass Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:46:31 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 cajfox@mail.bg wrote: > I have the USB support working, my FreeBSD system has > detected the device, dmesg > detects it and all looks fine. But when I type: > mount_msdosfs /dev/da0 /mnt/usb a I am running v6 and use the following mount -t msdos /dev/da0s1 /mnt/your_dir here/ - -- BORGER KING: "We do it our way. Your way is irrelevant." Ronny Hippler || Spartanburg SC http://www.ronnyhippler.com/ || ftp://ftp.vr5.dyndns.org:2112/ PGP key: http://www.ronnyhippler.com/Ronny_Hippler_PGP.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDl7qRN6qJSxoonroRAtVMAJ9tbRsq0auwkAprnoJPVMjCvBChWACfSSSN iNbxntzKVrKscgEIyOzrBS4= =GE1z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 16:58:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEA816A41F for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:58:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csullivan@jmchd.com) Received: from mail.jmchd.com (mail.jmchd.com [209.173.40.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEF443D4C for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:58:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csullivan@jmchd.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (global [209.173.40.100]) by mail.jmchd.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB8GtueT074223 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:55:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from csullivan@jmchd.com) Message-ID: <4398661F.7020004@jmchd.com> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:58:07 -0600 From: Chad Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Adaptec 2025SA - No Disks Found Error during installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:58:24 -0000 Just received my brand new servers and while trying to install FreeBSD 6.0 the error "No disks found..." I have checked to see if the device is being probed properly, however, I'm not sure if it is or not. The controller is Adaptec 2025SA. It does not appear on supported hardware and this troubles me. Is their a work around? If so then can someone please point me to the right driver? Thanks in advance. This is the first real issue freebsd has given me. I am hoping it is just my lack of experience. Chad ** From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 18:00:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9DD16A4CC for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vitaliyny@yahoo.com) Received: from web60718.mail.yahoo.com (web60718.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A24CD43D79 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:00:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vitaliyny@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 29399 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Dec 2005 18:00:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=aemJ9SPfywp2PYHHuLwvI1MhpfIMeOW4PAAQ66f5HPL/IbqNyDrMIrpRjxUr7siAD90yAw6JDHG0zkEywBtyBa3I6z2ds0hGiAq38IdtiDHb4iXJmi7kUiW+mdPKtkCPtjt3tKGHg39KP3iwhugDlzO16RngmSniIYdUEvxNv+U= ; Message-ID: <20051208180032.29397.qmail@web60718.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.186.176.206] by web60718.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:00:32 PST Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:00:32 -0800 (PST) From: Vitaliy S To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:00:47 -0000 Hello! Can you please tell me which platform package should I use with xeon 64 bits processor to get maximum productivity on that cpu? Vitaliy. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Shopping Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 20:13:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B6A16A427 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 20:13:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from riamccoy@public.gz.cn) Received: from public.gz.cn (83-102-232-140.broadband.corbina.ru [83.102.232.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B3DC43D9F for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 20:12:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from riamccoy@public.gz.cn) Message-ID: <000001c5fc33$8d4247b0$9273a8c0@diesis> From: "Ria Mccoy" To: "Venetia Halligan" Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:11:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: discontinuous X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ria Mccoy List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:13:01 -0000 http://www.supessin.com =20 =20 implementation of the Novgorod process was simple in structure. A compounds staff created the daily training schedules for each individual section, and the trainers, both permanent and part-time retirees, commandeered all individual and group activities while the candidates carried them out, using only the language of the compound and the dialects of the specific areas in which they were located. No Russian was permitted; the rule was tested frequently by the trainers who would suddenly bark orders or insults in the native language, which the candidates could not acknowledge understanding. When you say assignments, Bourne had asked, what do you mean? Situations, mah friend. Jest about anything you might think of. Like ordering lunch or dinner, or buying clothes, or fillin the tank of your car, requesting a specific gasoline ... leaded or unleaded and the From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 23:46:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF7216A41F for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 23:46:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rationing@merlo.as) Received: from 202-151-70-255.dsl.teleguam.net (202-151-70-255.dsl.teleguam.net [202.151.70.255]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EFA843DAD for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 23:46:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rationing@merlo.as) Received: from unknown (HELO Patagonia) (192.168.39.31) by 202-151-70-255.dsl.teleguam.net with SMTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:51:14 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1065851121.668445784@202-151-70-255.dsl.teleguam.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org From: Hadrian Baird Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 23:46:27 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Are you happy about your size and sexual performance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:46:49 -0000 ADD 3+ inches today - don't get left behind http://www.kurevalw.net/pt/ Television is for appearing on - not for looking at. Stone walls do not a prison make, nor iron bars a cage. He hadn't a single redeeming vice. It's simple. It's just things with chalk on a board. A prudent question is one half of wisdom. From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 9 00:35:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBEC16A460 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:35:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from mail.united-ware.com (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F4043D78 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:35:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.united-ware.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jB90f57D012829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:41:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:37:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart34371696.LhWJs0ku2e"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512081937.34504.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_40, MYFREEBSD2 autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1205/Wed Dec 7 09:00:48 2005 on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: 16bit 10MB Flash Card "Card has no functions!" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:35:41 -0000 --nextPart34371696.LhWJs0ku2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I've got the following flash card (circa 1993) that I'd like to at=20 least mount and copy files off of. It is from an old Omnibook 300=20 with some old Windows 3.1 software. Ideally I'd like to flash=20 =46reeBSD to the disk so that I can bootstrap something off of the 40MB=20 harddrive. I'm not sure if this even possible. The following is the=20 debug output from inserting it into my CURRENT laptop. pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 pccard0: Card has no functions! cbb0: PC Card card activation failed pccard0: chip_socket_enable pccard0: read_cis cis mem map 0xcc9d4000 (resource: 0x88000000) pccard0: CIS tuple chain: unhandled CISTPL 13 13 43 53 03 9d 40 00 00 00 00 01 65 6c 74 2d 61 6b 72 20 6f 00 4d 49 4f 4b 4f 00 06 17 01 01 14 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 07 46 53 30 44 08 85 ff 55 00 c4 13 ff ff ff 00 00 00 ff 00 00 00 ff 00 0f 00 ff CISTPL_NONE 00 unhandled CISTPL 0 unhandled CISTPL f 0f 00 CISTPL_END ff cis mem map cc9d4000 CISTPL_DEVICE type=3Dflash speed=3D200ns 01 03 52 9d ff unhandled CISTPL 40 40 29 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 48 65 77 6c 65 74 74 2d 50 61 63 6b 61 72 64 20 43 6f 2e 00 4f 4d 4e 49 42 4f 4f 4b 52 4f 4d 00 unhandled CISTPL 1e 1e 06 02 17 01 01 01 01 unhandled CISTPL 41 41 14 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 unhandled CISTPL 46 46 07 00 46 46 53 32 30 00 unhandled CISTPL 44 44 04 08 66 85 1a CISTPL_END ff pccard0: check_cis_quirks pccard0: Card has no functions! cbb0: PC Card card activation failed Thanks, =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart34371696.LhWJs0ku2e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDmNHOxqA5ziudZT0RAnYSAJ0eRevUBUqTyf6rEUo6KFL6XQS1tACfYQH4 e+PKeUfRpPIg4n98jn1+oso= =KHzo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart34371696.LhWJs0ku2e-- From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 9 21:01:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8625816A41F for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:01:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derth@wbs.co.za) Received: from mail-01.jhb.wbs.co.za (mail-01.jhb.wbs.co.za [196.30.31.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74DE43D5A for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:01:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derth@wbs.co.za) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.wbs.co.za) by mail-01.jhb.wbs.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EkpN6-0005UT-3n for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:01:40 +0200 Received: from 196.2.105.90 (SquirrelMail authenticated user derth@wbs.co.za) by webmail.wbs.co.za with HTTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 23:01:40 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <10245.196.2.105.90.1134162100.squirrel@webmail.wbs.co.za> In-Reply-To: <200512081937.34504.mistry.7@osu.edu> References: <200512081937.34504.mistry.7@osu.edu> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 23:01:40 +0200 (SAST) From: derth@wbs.co.za To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Original-Subject: D-Link DGE-550T Subject: D-Link DGE-550T X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:01:44 -0000 Good Evening, I have posted this before but I did not receive any response. Is there a freebsd drive for the D-Link DGE-550T gigabit network card? Thanks Rudi From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 10 04:19:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F1516A41F for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:19:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fhard@ccstores.com) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC6443D46 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:19:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fhard@ccstores.com) Received: from 100-58-114-64.qcislands.net ([64.114.58.100] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EkwDG-00012i-N3; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:19:58 -0800 Message-ID: <439A576E.3070302@ccstores.com> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:19:58 -0800 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (00) Subject: watchdog timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:20:00 -0000 on FreeBSD 5.4 I simply never had this problem on 6.0, it is continuous. A PCMCIA card, 3Com Megahertz 10/100 Lan Cardbus PC Card 3CCFE575BT xl0: watchdog timeout over and over and over It has forced me to switch back to 5.4 on my laptop. Can anyone offer an explanation why 5.4 wouldn't complain, but 6.0 won't _stop_ ? Thanks, Jim From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 10 11:36:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B7C16A41F for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:36:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benny.goemans@telenet.be) Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be (adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C3643D49 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:36:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benny.goemans@telenet.be) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 853573818C for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:36:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from bennypc (d51A4D51F.access.telenet.be [81.164.213.31]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7ED380C5 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:36:00 +0100 (CET) From: Benny To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:35:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <439A576E.3070302@ccstores.com> In-Reply-To: <439A576E.3070302@ccstores.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512101235.59795.benny.goemans@telenet.be> Subject: Re: watchdog timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:36:02 -0000 Hi, I can't give you an explanation for it, but I can tell you that I have been experiencing te same problem. It even made me switch back to another network card since I didn't want to bother degrading to 5.4 again. I really could use some help on this too. Thanks, Benny On Saturday 10 December 2005 05:19, Jim Pazarena wrote: > on FreeBSD 5.4 I simply never had this problem > on 6.0, it is continuous. > > A PCMCIA card, 3Com Megahertz 10/100 Lan Cardbus PC Card > 3CCFE575BT > > xl0: watchdog timeout > > over and over and over > > It has forced me to switch back to 5.4 on my laptop. > Can anyone offer an explanation why 5.4 wouldn't complain, > but 6.0 won't _stop_ ? > > Thanks, > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"