From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Oct 17 11:10:39 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA02293 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 11:10:39 -0700 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA02288 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 11:10:37 -0700 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA27915; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 11:02:29 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199510171802.LAA27915@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: A couple problems in FreeBSD 2.1.0-950922-SNAP To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 11:02:29 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199510162248.XAA27324@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Oct 16, 95 11:48:31 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 783 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > > What you mean by majority? Russian users amount is comparable > > > with all european users, why not extend default table to KOI8-R > > > instead? > > > > Because post ANSI 3.64 terminal control codes reserve 0x80..0x9f and > > KOI8-R does not respect this international standard? > > Terry, before giving public statements, please look at the character > set. It's included in the latest public fix from XConsortium and in > XFree86 3.1.2, so you shouldn't have a hard time to find something > about it. It has characters "which may be omitted" in the range 0x80-0x9f. Perhaps the font has chosen that option (and it is an option)? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.