Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:06:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, perl@FreeBSD.org, skv@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: change to bsd.perl.mk Message-ID: <4E212A50.3030506@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110716050732.GB25141@lonesome.com> References: <20110716050732.GB25141@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/15/2011 22:07, Mark Linimon wrote: > Per Doug Barton's suggestion, I have reworked the long-standing patch > to bsd.perl.mk to be an exact copy of the logic in bsd.port.mk, and > done an -exp run. Does anyone have any objection if I commit this > patch? This is actually the exact opposite of what I suggested. My suggestion is that we put all of the necessary perl stuff in bsd.perl.mk, and in bpm we make inclusion of bsd.perl.mk conditional on USE_PERL5. Following that change do an -exp run and ask for help fixing any ports that don't properly define USE_PERL5. If bsd.perl.mk is going to be included unconditionally, what's the point of having it in a separate file? Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E212A50.3030506>