Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 May 2000 16:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dan Langille <dan@freebsddiary.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: where did mail/qpopper3 come from?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005301613260.54064-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005311107360.59192-100000@ducky.nz.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Dan Langille wrote:

> I've heard of repo copies before, but not seen any practical application 
> for them.  I assume popper3 is not an "official" port until a later
> stage.  It would become "official" after a commit (which in turn would
> generate a message to the cvs-all mailing list) [1].

Right. They're done to preserve the history of the files, so that people
doing a 'cvs log' will see history stretching back to pre-3.0 versions, in
this case. It actually happens quite a bit (the other major use is if
files need to be moved from one part of the tree to another).

> [1] - for those that haven't guessed already, my questions were entirely
> selfish and I was worried I'd missed something about creation of new
> ports.  I was asking from a http://freshports.org/ point of view.

:_)

Kris

----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005301613260.54064-100000>