From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 16:31:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C42216A4CE for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12ECB43FDF for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:31:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from atici@myrealbox.com) Received: from atici [128.59.192.93] by myrealbox.com with NetMail ModWeb Module; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:31:30 -0500 From: "Alp ATICI" To: arch@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:31:30 -0500 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: atici MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1068597090.625edae0atici@myrealbox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Patches to compile the kernel with Intel's C/C++ compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:31:25 -0000 > What are the benefits of running an icc compiled kernel? The main reason for icc development is to support IA-64 because EPIC archit= ecture is very demanding on the compiler side. That's why the real benefi= t should be apparent with an IA-64 computer eventually. Does this patch work for IA-64?