Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 31 Jan 1998 16:04:24 -0600
From:      Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com>
To:        Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net>
Cc:        Brian Tao <taob@nbc.netcom.ca>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RAID controllers - folks, check this thing out
Message-ID:  <19980131160423.30536@right.PCS>
In-Reply-To: <19980131155527.19192@mcs.net>; from Karl Denninger on Jan 01, 1998 at 03:55:27PM -0600
References:  <19980131144604.03410@mcs.net> <Pine.GSO.3.95.980131161942.27817Z-100000@tor-adm1> <19980131155527.19192@mcs.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 01, 1998 at 03:55:27PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
> RAID 5, due to the way it stripes parity across the volumes, has a "sweet
> spot" in performance at 5 spindles.

This is only true if your stripe set is 4 spindles.  There's nothing 
wrong with using a stripe set of 8 spindles (9 devices), except that 
it tends to make small writes slower, since your data is spread out
over more devices.

5 devices is not an inherent property of RAID 5, AFAIK. 
--
Jonathan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980131160423.30536>