Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 01:36:44 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, smp@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Locking down a socket, milestone 1 Message-ID: <20020425083644.GM38320@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <200204250819.g3P8J00o013784@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> References: <200204241110.g3OB8u8t006194@bunko> <XFMail.20020424101801.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200204250819.g3P8J00o013784@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> [020425 01:19] wrote: > >> > >> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/socket_milestone1.diff.gz > >> This looks really good so far! Needs some more comments explaining socq_lock. Watch long line wraps. Why is there a "sigio" lock in this delta? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020425083644.GM38320>